Re: to_char and i18n

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Manuel Sugawara <masm(at)fciencias(dot)unam(dot)mx>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>
Subject: Re: to_char and i18n
Date: 2005-12-22 04:17:08
Message-ID: 18819.1135225028@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Manuel Sugawara <masm(at)fciencias(dot)unam(dot)mx> writes:
> Now that Oracle supports i18n dependant behavior in its to_char
> formatting functions (at least for its 10g release) I was wondering if
> a patch to support this in PostgreSQL will get accepted.

I thought to_char already had i18n behavior. What exactly are you
thinking of changing?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Manuel Sugawara 2005-12-22 04:20:05 Re: to_char and i18n
Previous Message Manuel Sugawara 2005-12-22 04:10:43 Re: to_char and i18n

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Manuel Sugawara 2005-12-22 04:20:05 Re: to_char and i18n
Previous Message Manuel Sugawara 2005-12-22 04:10:43 Re: to_char and i18n