Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mi abr 27 17:10:37 -0300 2011:
>> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>>> Apparently this change is causing Moa's SunStudio compiler to fail an
>>> assertion.

>> [ scratches head... ]  Hard to see why, there's nothing at all
>> interesting in that code.

> I agree, but it fails exactly in that code, and started to fail
> immediately after that patch.

> Maybe casting the 2 to int64 would fix it?

I'm not excited about trying random code changes to dodge a compiler bug
with a 24-hour turnaround time.  Dave, can you poke at this?

			regards, tom lane

In response to

• Re: pgsql: Fix pg_size_pretty() to avoid overflow for inputs close to INT64 at 2011-04-27 20:31:22 from Alvaro Herrera

Responses

• Re: pgsql: Fix pg_size_pretty() to avoid overflow for inputs close to INT64 at 2011-04-28 19:33:44 from Dave Page

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Palle Girgensohn	Date: 2011-04-28 05:25:41
	Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL Core Team
Previous:	From: Dmitry Fefelov	Date: 2011-04-28 05:05:26
	Subject: Re: Fail to search in array, produced by subquery - is it a bug?

pgsql-committers by date

Next:	From: Dave Page	Date: 2011-04-28 09:14:55
	Subject: edb-debugger - server: Support the new DefineCustomStringVariable API in
Previous:	From: Hiroshi Saito	Date: 2011-04-28 01:03:36
	Subject: psqlodbc - psqlodbc: Prep release 09.00.0300.