Re: [HACKERS] Is "trust" really a good default?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Is "trust" really a good default?
Date: 2004-07-13 21:16:13
Message-ID: 18703.1089753373@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

"Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> writes:
>> The only part of this discussion that I'd really be prepared=20
>> to buy into
>> is the part about *if* you use -W or --pwfile, then set up pg_hba.conf
>> with MD5 as the default auth (because that's probably what the user
>> wants anyway).

> Ok. Here is a patch that does this.

... and rather severely mangles the comments, too; not to mention the
more basic problem that the comments will now be wrong.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2004-07-13 21:17:29 Re: Anoncvs down?
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2004-07-13 21:12:59 Re: Release planning (was: Re: Status report)

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-07-13 21:17:19 Re: pgsql-server: Have \dn+ show permissions and description
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2004-07-13 20:58:13 Re: pgsql-server: Have \dn+ show permissions and description for schemas.