Re: Comments on SQL/Med objects

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Comments on SQL/Med objects
Date: 2011-03-28 04:06:22
Message-ID: 18690.1301285182@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Yeah, I had a private TODO about that. I'd like to see if we can
>> refactor the grammar to eliminate some of the duplication there
>> as well as the potential for oversights of this sort. I believe
>> that USER MAPPINGs are missing from ObjectType as well as a bunch
>> of other basic places ...

> Are you going to work on this? If not I can pick it up, at least
> insofar as making the comment stuff work across the board.

I'm still up to my rear in collations, so feel free.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-03-28 04:29:06 Re: Comments on SQL/Med objects
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-03-28 04:01:40 Re: Comments on SQL/Med objects