Performance glitch in GetCurrentAbsoluteTime()

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Performance glitch in GetCurrentAbsoluteTime()
Date: 1999-10-30 22:59:44
Message-ID: 18669.941324384@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I have been doing some profiling this weekend in response to Vadim's
challenge to reduce the amount of overhead in a simple INSERT command.
I've found a number of simple improvements that I hope to check in
shortly. I came across something in the time code that I thought I'd
better check with you before changing.

In utils/adt/nabstime.c, the function GetCurrentAbsoluteTime() is called
during each StartTransaction in order to save the transaction's start
time. It shows up unreasonably high in my profile (> 1% of runtime):

0.62 10.22 100001/100001 StartTransaction [65]
[91] 1.4 0.62 10.22 100001 GetCurrentAbsoluteTime [91]
0.92 8.30 100001/100001 localtime [105]
0.88 0.00 100001/100004 time [305]
0.12 0.00 100001/104713 strcpy [479]

Now the interesting thing about this is that the essential part of the
function is just the time() call, AFAICS, and that's quite cheap. More
than 90% of the runtime is being spent in the "if (!HasCTZSet)" branch.
I see no reason for that code to be run during every single transaction.
It sets the following variables:

CTimeZone
CDayLight
CTZName

CDayLight is not used *anywhere* except for debug printouts, and could
go away completely. CTZName is not used if USE_POSIX_TIME is defined,
which is true on most platforms. CTimeZone is not quite as useless, but
there are only a couple places where it's used when USE_POSIX_TIME is
true, and they don't look like critical-path stuff to me.

We could almost say that these variables need only be set once per
backend startup, but I suppose that would do the wrong thing in a
backend that's left running over a daylight-savings transition.

What I'm inclined to do is arrange for these variables to be calculated
only on-demand, at most once per transaction. It'd be even nicer to
get rid of them entirely, but I don't think I understand the time code
well enough to venture that.

Do you have any comments pro or con on this?

regards, tom lane

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 1999-10-30 23:32:52 Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump, and strings
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 1999-10-30 22:58:46 Re: [HACKERS] Function-manager redesign: second draft (long)