Re: Google SoC--Idea Request

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
Cc: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, John DeSoi <desoi(at)pgedit(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Google SoC--Idea Request
Date: 2006-04-20 15:04:31
Message-ID: 18559.1145545471@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> writes:
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 08:51:25AM -0400, Robert Treat wrote:
>> I think Martin Oosterhout's nearby email on coverity bug reports might make a
>> good SoC project, but should it also be added to the TODO list?
> ...
> In any case, after you weed out the false-positives and exclude ECPG
> you're only talking about less than 50 issues that may need to be
> addressed. Hardly a project that will take any amount of time.

Nor one we'd be willing to wait till the summer to address, if any of
the bugs are real.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-04-20 15:11:19 Re: pg_dump -Ft failed on Windows XP
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2006-04-20 15:01:42 Re: pg_dump -Ft failed on Windows XP