Re: temporal variants of generate_series()

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
Cc: JEAN-PIERRE PELLETIER <pelletier_32(at)sympatico(dot)ca>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: temporal variants of generate_series()
Date: 2007-05-07 01:07:13
Message-ID: 18542.1178500033@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> writes:
> Also, what would be the appropriate way to put this into initdb?

You seem to have missed a step here, which is to convince people that
these belong in core at all. So far I've not even seen an argument that
would justify putting them in contrib. If they *were* of sufficiently
wide use to justify putting them into core, a more efficient
implementation would probably be expected.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-05-07 01:25:21 Re: row-level stats and last analyze time
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-05-07 00:48:28 Re: plperl vs. bytea