Re: Re: SOMAXCONN (was Re: Solaris source code)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Ian Lance Taylor <ian(at)zembu(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: SOMAXCONN (was Re: Solaris source code)
Date: 2001-07-11 15:24:57
Message-ID: 18418.994865097@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Ian Lance Taylor <ian(at)zembu(dot)com> writes:
> But I wouldn't worry about it, and I wouldn't worry about Nathan's
> suggestion for making the limit configurable, because Postgres
> connections don't spend time on the queue. The postgres server will
> be picking them off as fast as it can. If the server can't pick
> processes off fast enough, then your system has other problems;

Right. Okay, it seems like just making it a hand-configurable entry
in config.h.in is good enough for now. When and if we find that
that's inadequate in a real-world situation, we can improve on it...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-07-11 15:28:58 Re: Possible feature?
Previous Message Mark 2001-07-11 15:16:05 vacuum problems