Re: [pgsql-general] In memory tables/databases

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Alexander Todorov <alexx(dot)todorov(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [pgsql-general] In memory tables/databases
Date: 2007-07-01 23:04:11
Message-ID: 18394.1183331051@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> writes:
> On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 03:55:11PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> So mount a ramdisk and initdb in there.

> You could also put a tablespace on a ramdisk and create the table
> there.

The fresh-initdb approach is more likely to work without any strange
corner cases. If you try a setup where the system catalogs are on
persistent storage but you have a tablespace on ramdisk, then after
restart you'll have pg_class entries referencing files that don't exist
anymore, which I believe will provoke errors.

Also, I doubt the OP wants his WAL on real storage either ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2007-07-01 23:04:17 Re: [pgsql-general] In memory tables/databases
Previous Message Bjorn Boulder 2007-07-01 22:57:43 [pgsql.general] Problem connecting PostgreSQL 8.2 to Rails 1.2