Re: Ooops ... seems we need a re-release pronto

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
Cc: Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Ooops ... seems we need a re-release pronto
Date: 2007-02-06 19:16:05
Message-ID: 18361.1170789365@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> writes:
> On Feb 6, 2007, at 12:40 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> ... massive expansion of the tests doesn't seem justified

> What about the idea that's been floated in the past about a --
> extensive mode for regression testing that would (generally) only be
> used by the build farm. That would mean others wouldn't have to
> suffer through extremely long make check's.

> Or is there another reason not to expand the tests?

I'm not concerned so much about the runtime as the development and
maintenance effort...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2007-02-06 19:29:52 getting status transaction error
Previous Message Jim Nasby 2007-02-06 19:05:25 Re: Ooops ... seems we need a re-release pronto