| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
| Cc: | jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de> |
| Subject: | Re: 8.4 release planning (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules) |
| Date: | 2009-01-27 17:43:31 |
| Message-ID: | 18343.1233078211@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> writes:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 5:20 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Nobody has suggested bouncing HS; there is only a debate about how soon
>> it's likely to be appliable. Any company who imagined they had a
>> guarantee about it getting into 8.4 is simply misguided.
> I was complaining about it being bounced to 8.5 without proper review
> as I've said elsewhere in one of these threads.
Huh? It's been getting "proper review" for three months now. I don't
think I need to have studied the code in detail before I'm entitled to
point out that it's horribly late and is still getting revised like mad.
If it weren't something that people desperately want, it would have been
punted to 8.5 quite some time ago.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2009-01-27 17:45:35 | Re: Hot standby, recovery infrastructure |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2009-01-27 17:41:46 | Re: 8.4 release planning |