Re: pg_clog woes with 7.3.2 - Episode 2

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_clog woes with 7.3.2 - Episode 2
Date: 2003-04-16 15:22:22
Message-ID: 18323.1050506542@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> One initdb and reload later (it's a new system, the old is still running
> OK), and the error comes back again, only this time Tom finds the
> corruption is in a couple of pages. Memtest86 again shows no errors, but
> eventually badblocks did, but only when I used a destructive read write
> test.

> So, the disk goes back to Seagate, and is replaced with another
> identical one, and a similar problem reoccurs (logs below) :-(. I
> haven't run badblocks yet as it takes a fair while, but wanted to find
> out if anyone thought this could be an OS issue or something else.
> Previously I've been using the 2.4.19 Linux kernel, however this machine
> is 2.4.20 (Slackware Linux 9). The SCSI adaptor is an Adaptec 29160, and
> the disks are 34Gb Seagate Cheetah X15's.

How annoying. My bet would be on the SCSI adaptor being the problem.
Or you could have a cabling issue --- SCSI is not as bad as IDE, but
it's still finicky, esp w.r.t. termination.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rob Butler 2003-04-16 15:31:04 Re: cross-db queries (was Are we losing momentum?)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-04-16 15:05:49 Re: [INTERFACES] First draft of new FE/BE protocol spec posted for comments