Re: Smaller access privilege changes

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Smaller access privilege changes
Date: 2001-05-24 19:02:14
Message-ID: 1818.990730934@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> * rename the internal representation: s = select, i = insert, u = update,
> d = delete, R = rules

> If we are voting, I kind of like the newer letters.

Actually, I like 'em too ... *if* they're the final set. I'm just
concerned about the idea of breaking user applications for an
intermediate stop on the way to full SQL92 privilege specs. It'd be
especially nasty if we found ourselves using non-intuitive coding for
the full SQL specs so as to stay compatible with an intermediate stop.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-05-24 19:17:53 Re: [HACKERS] HP Unix 11.00 Compiler error.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-05-24 18:58:01 Re: Bug#98565: postgresql logs notices with GMT timestamps in syslog (fwd)