From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Smaller access privilege changes |
Date: | 2001-05-24 19:02:14 |
Message-ID: | 1818.990730934@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> * rename the internal representation: s = select, i = insert, u = update,
> d = delete, R = rules
> If we are voting, I kind of like the newer letters.
Actually, I like 'em too ... *if* they're the final set. I'm just
concerned about the idea of breaking user applications for an
intermediate stop on the way to full SQL92 privilege specs. It'd be
especially nasty if we found ourselves using non-intuitive coding for
the full SQL specs so as to stay compatible with an intermediate stop.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-05-24 19:17:53 | Re: [HACKERS] HP Unix 11.00 Compiler error. |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-05-24 18:58:01 | Re: Bug#98565: postgresql logs notices with GMT timestamps in syslog (fwd) |