| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
| Cc: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, Larry Rosenman <lrosenman(at)pervasive(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: patch review, please: Autovacuum/Vacuum times via stats. |
| Date: | 2006-05-03 18:25:54 |
| Message-ID: | 18124.1146680754@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
> On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 05:49:33PM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
>> Back in the discussion of this someone had mentioned capturing all the
>> info that you'd get from a vacuum verbose; dead tuples, etc. What do
>> people think about that? In particular I think it'd be handy to know how
>> many pages vacuum wanted in the FSM vs. how many it got; this would make
>> it much easier for people to ensure that the FSM is large enough.
Isn't this already dealt with by contrib/pg_freespacemap?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim Buttafuoco | 2006-05-03 18:28:53 | Re: drop database command blocking other connections |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-05-03 18:23:08 | Re: drop database command blocking other connections |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-05-03 18:49:44 | Re: Page at a time index scan |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2006-05-03 18:08:22 | Re: Page at a time index scan |