| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>, Christophe Pettus <christophe(dot)pettus(at)pgexperts(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] BUG #14825: enum type: unsafe use? |
| Date: | 2017-10-04 01:29:22 |
| Message-ID: | 1805.1507080562@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Do you have any suggestion as to how we should transmit the blacklist to
> parallel workers?
Perhaps serialize the contents into an array in DSM, then rebuild a hash
table from that in the worker. Robert might have a better idea though.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2017-10-04 01:38:56 | Re: [BUGS] BUG #14825: enum type: unsafe use? |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2017-10-03 23:53:41 | Re: [HACKERS] BUG #14825: enum type: unsafe use? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-10-04 01:34:02 | Re: 64-bit queryId? |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2017-10-04 01:29:21 | Re: Warnings in objectaddress.c |