From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | neilc(at)samurai(dot)com, alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl, simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Please release (was Re: nodeAgg perf tweak) |
Date: | 2004-12-02 03:04:43 |
Message-ID: | 1800.1101956683@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> I've raised this before, but would like to suggest again that there might be
> virtue in branching earlier in the dev cycle - maybe around the time of the
> first beta.
Given the amount of patching that's gone on, branching 8.1 earlier would
have meant a great deal more work for the committers, in the form of
double-patching stuff. And I don't know about the other committers, but
I've certainly had no spare bandwidth for reviewing or applying 8.1-cycle
patches anyway. So I think we made the right move to delay the branch.
Core hasn't really talked about the point yet, but I suspect we'll make
the branch after 8.0RC1 appears (which hopefully will be Real Soon).
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Fuhr | 2004-12-02 03:10:24 | Re: New compile warnings for inheritance |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2004-12-02 02:53:46 | Re: Please release (was Re: nodeAgg perf tweak) |