Re: NOT IN subquery optimization

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
Cc: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Li, Zheng" <zhelli(at)amazon(dot)com>, "Finnerty, Jim" <jfinnert(at)amazon(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: NOT IN subquery optimization
Date: 2019-03-05 14:37:55
Message-ID: 17971.1551796675@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> writes:
> I'm not sure if I have an issue with competing patches on the same
> thread. I've seen that before and it can lead to a good outcome. It
> case, as you say, also lead to confusion.

It's a bit of a shame that the cfbot will only be testing one of them
at a time if we leave it like this. I kind of lean towards the
two-thread, two-CF-entry approach because of that. The amount of
confusion is a constant.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2019-03-05 14:50:59 Re: [Issue] Can't recompile cube extension as PGXS, utils/float.h is not installed
Previous Message Tom Lane 2019-03-05 14:35:14 Re: proposal: new polymorphic types - commontype and commontypearray