| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Darcy Buskermolen <darcy(at)wavefire(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 8.0 Open Items |
| Date: | 2004-08-21 03:44:28 |
| Message-ID: | 17844.1093059868@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Darcy Buskermolen wrote:
>>> * remove to_char(interval) if we initdb or mention removal
>>
>> I vote just to mention it's removal at this time,
> Agreed. Done.
While I don't care that much one way or the other --- what is the
difference between this and the prior state? Karel already said
in the 7.4 docs that to_char(interval) would be removed in the next
release. Why would the people who ignored the warning last time
believe it this time round?
I think that 8.0 is a more appropriate release number in which to be
taking backwards-compatibility hits than 8.1. So if we're gonna do
it at all, I would vote for doing it now.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-08-21 04:01:39 | Re: 8.0 Open Items |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-08-21 03:25:05 | Re: 8.0 Open Items |