Re: 8.2 beta blockers

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jimn(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 8.2 beta blockers
Date: 2006-09-18 22:12:45
Message-ID: 17843.1158617565@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Jim C. Nasby" <jimn(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> Would adding OID versions of the functions (so there'd be int8, (int4,
> int4) and (oid,oid)) be overkill?

I think what it'd mostly accomplish is to create "couldn't resolve
ambiguous function" errors :-(

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Dunstan 2006-09-18 22:15:19 Re: An Idea for OID conflicts
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-09-18 22:10:32 Re: 8.2 beta blockers