Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com> writes:
> He also worked out some OS level tools for module handling, but I
> think I'd prefer to have another notion in between, the extension.
> The extension would be a new SQL object referring to zero, one or more
> modules and one or more SQL scripts creating new SQL objects (schemas,
> tables, views, tablespaces, functions, types, casts, operator classes
> and families, etc, whatever SQL scripting we support now --- yes,
> index am would be great too).
This seems drastically overengineered. What do we need two levels of
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Andrew Dunstan||Date: 2009-03-22 21:15:27|
|Subject: Re: typedefs for indent|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2009-03-22 20:27:42|
|Subject: Re: typedefs for indent |