Re: pg_class.relpages/allvisible probably shouldn't be a int4

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_class.relpages/allvisible probably shouldn't be a int4
Date: 2014-05-12 11:11:00
Message-ID: 17497.1399893060@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 2014-05-12 10:07:29 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> But I concur that in practice, if you're dealing with 16TB tables, it's time
>> to partition.

> Well, we need to improve our partitioning for that to be viable for all
> relations. Not having usable foreign and unique keys makes it a pita in
> some cases.

Well, yeah, but that's on the to-do list in any case.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2014-05-12 11:29:29 Re: Archive recovery won't be completed on some situation.
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2014-05-12 11:10:03 cannot to compile PL/V8 on Fedora 20