Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend)
Date: 2001-07-18 23:55:52
Message-ID: 17331.995500552@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Remember most pg_description comments are not on column but on functions
> and stuff. That attributenumber is not going to apply there.

Sure, it'd just be zero for non-column items.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-07-19 00:00:10 Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-07-18 23:49:01 Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend)