Re: Performance of PostgreSQL on Windows vs Linux

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Jeremy Haile" <jhaile(at)fastmail(dot)fm>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Performance of PostgreSQL on Windows vs Linux
Date: 2007-01-04 15:23:51
Message-ID: 17034.1167924231@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

"Jeremy Haile" <jhaile(at)fastmail(dot)fm> writes:
> Thanks for the response! I know I have to benchmark them to get a real
> answer. I am just looking to hear someone say "We benchmarked Linux vs.
> Windows with similar configuration and hardware and experienced a 25%
> performance boost in Linux." or "We benchmarked them and found no
> significant difference."

I've heard anecdotal reports both ways: "there's no difference" and
"there's a big difference". So there's no substitute for benchmarking
your own application.

I think one big variable in this is which PG version you are testing.
We've been gradually filing down some of the rough edges in the native
Windows port, so I'd expect that the performance gap is closing over
time. I don't know how close to closed it is in 8.2, but I'd surely
suggest that you do your benchmarking with 8.2.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeremy Haile 2007-01-04 15:29:41 Re: Performance of PostgreSQL on Windows vs Linux
Previous Message Jeremy Haile 2007-01-04 14:46:53 Re: Performance of PostgreSQL on Windows vs Linux