Re: Update on replication

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jonathan Stanton <jonathan(at)cnds(dot)jhu(dot)edu>, Al Sutton <al(at)alsutton(dot)com>, Darren Johnson <darren(at)up(dot)hrcoxmail(dot)com>, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, "" <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Update on replication
Date: 2002-12-17 23:24:36
Message-ID: 17012.1040167476@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> What about asynchronous (triggered?) replication? Is something like
>> rserv or dbmirror going to be moved to main?

>> From what I've been able to tell *so far*, Postgres-R is going to preclude
> the ability for either to work ...

Why do you say that? If it can't coexist with other solutions, then it
surely will not be accepted, but I can't think of any reason why it
would preclude other approaches.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rod Taylor 2002-12-18 00:18:14 Re: Coerce to Domain
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-12-17 23:15:54 Re: Coerce to Domain