Re: An Analyze question

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: nickf(at)ontko(dot)com
Cc: "pgsql-admin" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: An Analyze question
Date: 2002-04-22 16:56:40
Message-ID: 16789.1019494600@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

"Nick Fankhauser" <nickf(at)ontko(dot)com> writes:
>> Offhand I would think that 7.2 is smart enough to deal with this

> We're on 7.1.3.

Hmm... I don't see why it would make any difference in 7.1
either. You weren't by any chance selecting on the most common
actor_id were you? Really 7.1 only has two possible selectivity
estimates for column = 'constant' --- either the constant is the
stored most-common-value, or it ain't. What do you get from

select attname,attdispersion,s.*
from pg_statistic s, pg_attribute a, pg_class c
where starelid = c.oid and attrelid = c.oid and staattnum = attnum
and relname = 'actor_case_assignment';

in each database?

> Here are the before & after explains again:
> Before:
> monroe=# explain select * from actor_cases where actor_id = '18105A7313 53';
> After:
> develop=# explain select * from actor_cases where actor_id = '18105A7313 53';

Are you really comparing apples to apples here? I'd think that a proper
comparison of plans would be

monroe=# explain select * from actor_cases where actor_id = 'A7313 53';
develop=# explain select * from actor_cases where actor_id = '18105A7313 53';

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nick Fankhauser 2002-04-22 17:24:27 Re: An Analyze question
Previous Message Nick Fankhauser 2002-04-22 16:05:20 Re: An Analyze question