| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Glen Parker <glenebob(at)nwlink(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Second attempt, roll your own autovacuum |
| Date: | 2006-12-19 06:28:03 |
| Message-ID: | 16760.1166509683@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Glen Parker <glenebob(at)nwlink(dot)com> writes:
> I am still trying to roll my own auto vacuum thingy.
Um, is this purely for hack value? What is it that you find inadequate
about regular autovacuum? It is configurable through the pg_autovacuum
catalog --- which I'd be the first to agree is a sucky user interface,
but we're not going to set the user interface in concrete until we are
pretty confident it's feature-complete. So: what do you see missing?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | CARMODA | 2006-12-19 06:47:21 | anyone got any suggestions for clustering? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-12-19 06:25:45 | Re: feature request for Postgresql Rule system. |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Zoltan Boszormenyi | 2006-12-19 07:43:23 | Re: 8.2.0 Tarball vs. REL8_2_0 vs. REL8_2_STABLE |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-12-19 04:56:22 | Re: effective_cache_size vs units |