Re: Patch to add Windows 7 support

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Patch to add Windows 7 support
Date: 2009-01-27 16:34:41
Message-ID: 16614.1233074081@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> writes:
> The risks are pretty low imho. Not having the flag means that the
> server has access to the handles of objects in other jobs in the same
> session. When running as a service, that's basically nothing as the
> service runs in it's own session and is isolated through other means.
> When run from the command line, a hacked binary could send messages to
> the users UI (buttons and other controls for example). It would be a
> difficult attack to pull off, and very hard to gain from it. It's easy
> enough to leave the flag in console mode however - that does work on
> Windows 7.

Okay, but +1 for leaving it on in console mode.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-01-27 16:36:02 Re: 8.4 release planning
Previous Message Robert Haas 2009-01-27 16:31:55 Re: 8.4 release planning