| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, YUriy Zhuravlev <u(dot)zhuravlev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics |
| Date: | 2016-03-29 17:24:40 |
| Message-ID: | 16555.1459272280@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> Dilip, could you test performance of reducing ppc's spinlock to 1 byte?
> Cross-compiling suggest that doing so "just works". I.e. replace the
> #if defined(__ppc__) typedef from an int to a char.
AFAICS, lwarx/stwcx are specifically *word* wide.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Petr Jelinek | 2016-03-29 17:26:28 | Re: Sequence Access Method WIP |
| Previous Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2016-03-29 17:22:00 | Re: Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics |