| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Michael Meskes <michael(at)fam-meskes(dot)de>, Kevin Grittner <kevin(dot)grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [HACKERS] ECPG dynamic cursor fix for UPDATE/DELETE ... WHERE CURRENT OF :curname |
| Date: | 2010-08-05 16:45:29 |
| Message-ID: | 16533.1281026729@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at> writes:
> Alvaro Herrera rta:
>> Since we're still in the beta phase, it makes sense to apply the fix
>> right now so that it appears in 9.0. No point in waiting for 9.0.1.
> It boils down to the fact that Michael doesn't have too much time
> and no one else knows ECPG in depth. So...
Yeah. I think what Michael is saying is he doesn't have time to review
the patch now and doesn't want to hold up 9.0 until he does. We can
delay 9.0 for him, or apply the patch unreviewed, or allow 9.0 to go out
with this as a known bug. I don't much care for #2, given the size of
the patch.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2010-08-05 16:47:40 | Re: Re: Re: [HACKERS] Online backup cause boot failure,anyone know why? |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2010-08-05 16:43:52 | Re: Concurrent MERGE |