From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: recovery_connections cannot start (was Re: master in standby mode croaks) |
Date: | 2010-04-23 20:50:50 |
Message-ID: | 16464.1272055850@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> How about something like
> wal_additional_info = none | archive | connect
"connect" seems like a completely inappropriate word here. It is
not obviously related to HS slaves and it could be taken to refer
to ordinary database connections (sessions).
Personally I agree with your objection to "crash" but not with the
objection to "standby". Maybe this would be appropriate:
wal_mode = minimal | archive | hot_standby
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2010-04-23 21:26:55 | Re: recovery_connections cannot start (was Re: master in standby mode croaks) |
Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2010-04-23 20:50:29 | Re: recovery_connections cannot start (was Re: master in standby mode croaks) |