Re: [HACKERS] FYI: snapshot 4/28/1999 (fwd)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Mount <petermount(at)it(dot)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers List <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] FYI: snapshot 4/28/1999 (fwd)
Date: 1999-04-29 14:19:28
Message-ID: 16417.925395568@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Mount <petermount(at)it(dot)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk> writes:
> The weird thing is that the JDBC driver hasn't been sending an empty
> string since 6.2.x.
> It would be interesting to see if this patch fixes it however.

I'm unsure whether to blame my empty-query goof for the JDBC problem or
not. You say Monday's snapshot was OK --- but I committed that booboo
on Sunday, so it should have been in Monday's snap. Let us know whether
the problem is still there...

regards, tom lane

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Jewiss 1999-04-29 14:57:38 Re: [SQL] LIMIT
Previous Message José Soares 1999-04-29 14:02:15 Re: [SQL] LIMIT