Re: Disaster!

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>, Martín Marqués <martin(at)bugs(dot)unl(dot)edu(dot)ar>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Disaster!
Date: 2004-01-25 02:42:13
Message-ID: 16406.1074998533@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> FreeBSD 4.7/4.9 and the UFS filesystem

Hm, okay, I'm pretty sure that that combination wouldn't report ENOSPC
at close(). We need to fix the code to check close's return value,
probably, but it seems we still lack a clear explanation of what
happened to your database.

That request to look at your WAL files is still open ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

  • Re: Disaster! at 2004-01-25 00:21:45 from Christopher Kings-Lynne

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-01-25 04:04:56 Re: [patch] jdbc build fix when ./configure is run in separate
Previous Message Randolf Richardson 2004-01-25 01:40:59 Re: Copyright (C) 1996-2002