From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>,Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Stas Kelvich <s(dot)kelvich(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Speedup twophase transactions |
Date: | 2016-01-11 20:10:45 |
Message-ID: | 163D8179-83D3-49BF-BC18-E4E5A694276E@anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On January 11, 2016 8:57:58 PM GMT+01:00, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>On 11 January 2016 at 18:43, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>It's clear there are various additional tuning opportunities, but the
>objective of the current patch to improve performance is very, very
>clearly
>met, so I'm aiming to commit *this* patch soon.
Again, the WAL read routine used doesn't deal with timeline changes. So no, it's bit ready to be committed.
---
Please excuse brevity and formatting - I am writing this on my mobile phone.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-01-11 20:12:57 | Re: strange CREATE INDEX tab completion cases |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2016-01-11 20:03:05 | Re: strange CREATE INDEX tab completion cases |