Re: [PATCHES] LDAP auth

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] LDAP auth
Date: 2006-03-05 20:20:43
Message-ID: 16389.1141590043@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

"Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> writes:
> Was there ever a decision in "the libcurl thread"?

No, not yet.

Personally I'm unconvinced that we should depend on libcurl: if it's
going to use openldap to do LDAP work, then the only good reason to use
libcurl rather than openldap directly is if there's some clear use-case
for libcurl's other features. Which no one had presented AFAIR. I'm
still willing to be convinced though.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-03-05 20:30:30 Re: pg.conf re-reading in signal handler or at next return to main loop?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-03-05 20:15:03 Re: problem with large maintenance_work_mem settings and

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2006-03-05 21:38:45 Re: reorder GROUP BY list
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2006-03-05 20:11:00 Re: LDAP auth