| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Peter Darley" <pdarley(at)Kinesis-CEM(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Campano, Troy" <Troy(dot)Campano(at)LibertyMutual(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Shutting down postgresql |
| Date: | 2001-12-28 16:43:18 |
| Message-ID: | 1634.1009557798@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
"Peter Darley" <pdarley(at)Kinesis-CEM(dot)com> writes:
> Something that caught me up at first is that PostgreSQL won't shut down
> until all it's backends close, which means that if you have an application
> connected that uses pooled or cached connections you will probably have to
> shut it down first.
This depends on how the postmaster is commanded to shut down. I think
what Troy is looking for is the various stop-mode options to pg_ctl:
http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/app-pg-ctl.html
or perhaps he wants to know about the underlying signals that can be
sent to the postmaster:
http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/postmaster-shutdown.html
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2001-12-28 16:46:13 | Re: Shutting down postgresql |
| Previous Message | Peter Darley | 2001-12-28 16:16:12 | Re: Shutting down postgresql |