KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com> writes:
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> Wouldn't this omit comparing the null bitmap?
> Oops, I added the comparison of null bitmap here.
That's really, really ugly code. Why would it be necessary anyway?
Shouldn't the security tag be expected to match? I suppose that it
should be possible to alter a security tag with UPDATE, and that means
it cannot work the way OID does anyway. In a sane implementation the
field would already be valid before the triggers fire.
regards, tom lane