| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Are we sufficiently clear that jsonb containment is nested? |
| Date: | 2015-10-29 21:02:17 |
| Message-ID: | 16306.1446152537@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> writes:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> I think the existing text is largely my fault, so I'll do something with
>> this.
> Good. Thanks.
After studying the proposed patch a bit more, I still think the example
is good, but the added text doesn't do much to explain your point. If
I get what your point is, which maybe I don't, I think the attached might
clarify it better. What do you think of this version?
regards, tom lane
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| jsonb_nested_containment_doc-2.patch | text/x-diff | 1.5 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2015-10-29 21:16:44 | Re: Are we sufficiently clear that jsonb containment is nested? |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2015-10-29 20:46:01 | Re: Are we sufficiently clear that jsonb containment is nested? |