Re: Reason why set-value functions not allowed in GREATEST(), etc?

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Reason why set-value functions not allowed in GREATEST(), etc?
Date: 2010-02-22 18:16:57
Message-ID: 162867791002221016o7600a609t3b57464d6baf1274@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2010/2/22 Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> I just wonder why generate_series() is not allowed in GREATEST syntax.
> Looking through execQual.c,  almost all syntactic evaluations like
> COALESCE, ARRAY[], ROW() doesn't allow set-value functions. Could
> someone tell the underlying reason?
>
> Also, using variadic functions introduced since 8.4, I hope we can
> remove the special syntax cases for them by replacing them with normal
> variadic functions. Is it sane idea?

we cannot do it :(

we cannot ensure similar coercion for these functions with variadic
functions. Variadic functions use a generic coercion.

Regards
Pavel Stehule

>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Hitoshi Harada
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2010-02-22 18:18:03 Re: scheduler in core
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2010-02-22 18:14:51 Re: What does this configure warning mean?