Re: WIP: default values for function parameters

From: "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Zeugswetter Andreas OSB sIT" <Andreas(dot)Zeugswetter(at)s-itsolutions(dot)at>
Cc: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Gregory Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Grzegorz Jaskiewicz" <gj(at)pointblue(dot)com(dot)pl>, "PostgreSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Subject: Re: WIP: default values for function parameters
Date: 2008-12-15 09:54:26
Message-ID: 162867790812150154m1317f1efnb95f1fd5d7436de8@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2008/12/15 Zeugswetter Andreas OSB sIT <Andreas(dot)Zeugswetter(at)s-itsolutions(dot)at>:
>
>> it's look well, but I still prefer some combination with =
>>
>> name: = ''
>> name: => '''
>> :name = ''
>> $name => ..
>> $name = ..
>
> I wonder about name := ''.
>
> := is used in Pascal/Ada to assign a value. Or would that again be an allowed operator in pg ?
>

I like it too, but there is problem with possible collision with
custom operator

Pavel

> Andreas

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2008-12-15 10:05:55 Re: WIP: default values for function parameters
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2008-12-15 09:44:25 Re: Sync Rep: First Thoughts on Code