new vacuum is slower for small tables

From:	"Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To:	"postgres hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject:	new vacuum is slower for small tables
Date:	2008-12-08 12:31:38
Message-ID:	162867790812080431m509bdac1lb8782a54c3dfe215@mail.gmail.com
Views:	Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:	2008-12-08 12:31:38 from "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>  2008-12-08 12:45:53 from Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>  2008-12-08 14:36:37 from Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>   2008-12-08 15:01:51 from Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>    2008-12-08 15:13:23 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>   2008-12-08 15:09:42 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>    2008-12-08 15:32:00 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>   2008-12-08 15:40:55 from "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>    2008-12-08 15:57:16 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>     2008-12-08 18:44:39 from "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>      2008-12-08 20:20:34 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>       2009-01-20 17:31:50 from Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Lists:	pgsql-hackers

Responses

• Re: new vacuum is slower for small tables at 2008-12-08 12:45:53 from Gregory Stark
• Re: new vacuum is slower for small tables at 2008-12-08 14:36:37 from Heikki Linnakangas

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Gregory Stark	2008-12-08 12:45:53	Re: new vacuum is slower for small tables
Previous Message	Martijn van Oosterhout	2008-12-08 11:42:07	Re: Synchronous replication: sleeping