| From: | "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Neil Conway" <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: proposal: plpgsql return execute ... |
| Date: | 2008-02-27 21:35:16 |
| Message-ID: | 162867790802271335k60171bgc17639046870d108@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 27/02/2008, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 1:58 PM, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 15:24 +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > > I thing RETURN QUERY is successful idea. It should be completed with
> > > support of dynamic SQL.
> >
> > Yeah, I can see that being useful.
> >
> > > RETURN EXECUTE sqlstring [USING];
> >
> > What is the USING clause for?
>
>
> parameter binding.
>
> see: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2006-08/msg00267.php
>
>
> merlin
>
I sent modernized version
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2007-10/msg00161.php
Pavel
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2008-02-27 22:03:11 | new warning message |
| Previous Message | manolo.espa | 2008-02-27 20:34:29 | Re: [HACKERS] 2WRS [WIP] |