Re: proposal for 8.4: PL/pgSQL - statement CASE

From: "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: proposal for 8.4: PL/pgSQL - statement CASE
Date: 2008-01-17 16:43:45
Message-ID: 162867790801170843r3ec4b6d4qc9584e861cb281a6@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
> I'm sorry I thought we were developing PostgreSQL.
>

we develop PostgreSQL, but why create own syntax for all? Why? Only so
we develop PostgreSQL? We have different implementation and different
limit, but why create different syntax, I don't understand. It's like
Microsoft. Lot of things are little bit incompatible.

Pavel

> Sincerely,
>
> Joshua D. Drake
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2008-01-17 16:44:16 Re: OUTER JOIN performance regression remains in 8.3beta4
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2008-01-17 16:40:51 Re: proposal for 8.4: PL/pgSQL - statement CASE