From: | "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Cultural Sublimation" <cultural_sublimation(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Sam Mason" <sam(at)samason(dot)me(dot)uk>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PL/pgSQL and SETOF |
Date: | 2007-11-30 18:18:04 |
Message-ID: | 162867790711301018y3d036823u3b96730c344756da@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 30/11/2007, Cultural Sublimation <cultural_sublimation(at)yahoo(dot)com> wrote:
> > I would guess you're calling it like:
> >
> > SELECT get_items2();
> >
> > whereas, you should call set returning functions like:
> >
> > SELECT * FROM get_items2();
>
> Hi,
>
> Yeah, that was the problem -- thanks!
>
> But still on that subject: is my version of get_items2 the simplest
> that is possible in PL/pgSQL? It seems awfully verbose compared to
> the SQL version...
>
no. Your simplest version is historic relict and is available only in
sql language. I am not sure, maybe in C language too.
Pavel
> Regards,
> C.S.
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.
> http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2007-11-30 19:17:16 | Re: postgresql table inheritance |
Previous Message | Cultural Sublimation | 2007-11-30 18:12:40 | Re: PL/pgSQL and SETOF |