From: | "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Oleg Bartunov" <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> |
Subject: | Re: tsearch2api .. wrapper for integrated fultext |
Date: | 2007-11-13 21:53:52 |
Message-ID: | 162867790711131353r5cb7d51ch4b02a1228a3e18a6@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
On 13/11/2007, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I wrote:
> > I've modified Pavel's version into something that seems to support this
> > approach --- at least I can load the 8.2 tsearch regression test
> > database into 8.3 after loading this. Still needs some polishing
> > probably, and some more testing. Comments?
>
> I've committed this, replacing the old contrib/tsearch2 code.
>
> It successfully runs most of the old module's regression test, after
> some minor adjustments for default configuration names and suchlike.
> One large omission is that the rewrite(ARRAY[]) aggregate isn't there.
> AFAIR, we removed that just because it seemed a poorly designed API,
> not because it didn't work. I'm thinking we should probably pull the
> code for it out of the CVS history and stick it into contrib/tsearch2.
> Any thoughts pro or con?
>
+1
Pavel
> regards, tom lane
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-11-13 23:30:01 | Re: Contrib docs v1 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-11-13 21:14:55 | Re: tsearch2api .. wrapper for integrated fultext |