From: | "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Robert Treat" <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Dave Page" <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, derek(dot)rodner(at)enterprisedb(dot)com, peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net |
Subject: | Re: Using Postgres as an alias |
Date: | 2007-09-27 15:29:25 |
Message-ID: | 162867790709270829p76c460b2neee0d55c57e523b2@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
>
> > 3. All well products has DB or SQL in name.
>
> Oracle, Informix, Progress, Ingres, Vertica.... I think there is enough
> evidence on both sides that this can work or not. I'd give the nod that
> people who know software development but know nothing of open source
> databases are probably more likely to find us with SQL in the product name,
> but I'm not really sure how valid that is (for example, we are the #3 link in
> google for "open source database", I don't think that would change)
look to official names
Oracle Database ..
Informix Dynamic Server
Progress RDBMS
Pavel
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andreas Pflug | 2007-09-27 15:30:02 | name or alias |
Previous Message | Greg Smith | 2007-09-27 15:24:01 | Re: Using Postgres as an alias |