Re: Temp tables are curious creatures....

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Rod Taylor <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Temp tables are curious creatures....
Date: 2002-04-30 01:35:04
Message-ID: 16263.1020130504@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Rod Taylor <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca> writes:
> Appears psql needs to know how to differentiate between it's own temp
> tables and those of another connection.

More generally, psql is as yet clueless about schemas.

regression=# create schema foo;
CREATE
regression=# create schema bar;
CREATE
regression=# create table foo.tab1 (f1 int);
CREATE
regression=# create table bar.tab1 (f2 int);
CREATE
regression=# \d tab1
Table "tab1"
Column | Type | Modifiers
--------+---------+-----------
f1 | integer |
f2 | integer |

This is ... um ... wrong. I am not real sure what the right behavior
is, however. Should \d accept patterns like schema.table (and how
should its wildcard pattern matching fit with that?) If you don't
specify a schema, should it only show tables visible in your search
path?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-04-30 01:35:21 Re: Temp tables are curious creatures....
Previous Message Rod Taylor 2002-04-30 00:32:23 Temp tables are curious creatures....