Re: strict version of version_stamp.pl

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: strict version of version_stamp.pl
Date: 2009-05-08 21:50:28
Message-ID: 16172.1241819428@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Yes I apologize for that. Git reacted differently than I expected to a
> "git diff". I have since reposted a proper patch.

mmm ... I've recently been forced into using git for another project,
and I find myself mystified as to why anyone would want to use it.
Seems like baroqueness and unexpected behaviors are all over the thing.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Seth Robertson 2009-05-08 21:52:12 Re: [PATCH] Automatic client certificate selection support for libpq v1
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2009-05-08 21:50:24 Re: strict version of version_stamp.pl