Re: Remaining beta blockers

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Remaining beta blockers
Date: 2013-05-06 15:37:36
Message-ID: 16146.1367854656@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com> writes:
> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> It seems a bit late to be adding such a thing;

> No kidding. The same could be said for the rest of this. It was
> all talked to death months ago before I posted a patch which was
> proposed for commit. All this eleventh hour drama bothers me.

Well, we've been going back and forth about it for weeks. Without a
looming deadline, we'd probably still just be arguing inconclusively ...

> I didn't see anything I thought needed changing in your first patch
> (to disable unlogged matviews), and my suggested changes to your
> second patch (to move tracking of populated status to pg_class) are
> just names, aliases, and comments. I suggest you review my
> proposed tweak to your patch and apply both with any final
> polishing you feel are appropriate.

OK, will do.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2013-05-06 15:43:23 Re: Remaining beta blockers
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2013-05-06 15:32:05 Re: 9.3 release notes suggestions