Re: tsearch in core patch

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: tsearch in core patch
Date: 2007-06-27 14:14:33
Message-ID: 16095.1182953673@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru> writes:
>> But why do you need them to be different at all? Just make it
>> russian Russian_Russia
>> russian ru_RU
>>
>> Does that not work for some reason?

> I'd like to have unique names of configuration. So, if user sets GUC variable or
> call function with configuration's name then postgres should not have a choice
> --- it should use pointed configuration exactly.

Sure, but the configuration name in this example is "russian", and it's
unique, no?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-06-27 14:38:54 Re: Bgwriter LRU cleaning: we've been going at this all wrong
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-06-27 14:12:53 Re: Frustrating issue with PGXS