Re: Invalid YAML output from EXPLAIN

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Invalid YAML output from EXPLAIN
Date: 2010-06-07 14:56:40
Message-ID: 16079.1275922600@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

"Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> writes:
> I don't think the above would be particularly hard to implement myself,
> but if it becomes a really big deal, we can certainly punt by simply
> quoting anything containing an indicator (the special characters above).

I would go with that. The quoting rules you proposed previously seem
way too complicated --- meaning potentially buggy, and even if they're
not buggy, the behavior would seem unpredictable to most users.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andy Balholm 2010-06-07 15:16:36 Re: BUG #5490: INSERT doesn't force cast from text to timestamp
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2010-06-07 14:54:38 Re: [HACKERS] Invalid YAML output from EXPLAIN

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dean Rasheed 2010-06-07 15:17:55 Re: Invalid YAML output from EXPLAIN
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2010-06-07 14:54:38 Re: [HACKERS] Invalid YAML output from EXPLAIN